ind.ai

Inference Architecture

The ind.ai Inference Plan

Router-led, cost-aware, outcome-driven

ind.ai does not default to the most powerful model. It routes every request through a scoring system that selects the cheapest viable execution path — escalating to proprietary models only when task complexity, risk, or quality requirements demand it.

Inference Thesis

Three principles

Open-source is the mass-market layer

OSS models handle the majority of inference volume. They are fast, cheap, and improving rapidly. Most user requests never need proprietary models.

Proprietary is the escalation layer

Flagship models from frontier labs are used selectively — when reasoning depth, risk, or quality thresholds exceed what OSS can deliver.

The router decides the path

A scoring system evaluates every request across multiple dimensions and selects the cheapest viable execution class. No model is default.

Deterministic→OSS-Small→OSS-Mid→Proprietary-Mini→Proprietary-Premium

Escalation chain — always start left, move right only when required

Execution Classes

Five execution classes

Every inference request is classified into one of five execution classes. The router selects the lowest viable class.

Class 0

Deterministic

No model call. Direct lookup, API response, or cached result.

Balance checksStatus lookupsTime/date responsesCached FAQ answers
Class 1

OSS-Small

Lightweight open-source model. Fast, cheap, high-volume.

Simple classificationShort summarisationSentiment detectionIntent routing
Class 2

OSS-Mid

Larger open-source model. Stronger reasoning, still cost-efficient.

Multi-step draftingModerate reasoningTranslation with contextDocument extraction
Class 3

Proprietary-Mini

Smaller proprietary model. Better quality where OSS falls short.

Complex Q&ANuanced tone adjustmentMulti-document synthesisStructured output generation
Class 4

Proprietary-Premium

Flagship proprietary model. Reserved for high-stakes, high-complexity tasks.

Legal/financial reasoningMulti-step planningCode generation with validationEnterprise workflow orchestration

Task Mapping

Which tasks go where

Representative mapping — actual routing is dynamic and score-based.

Task
Class
Balance check / status lookup
0
Simple intent classification
1
Short summary or translation
1
Email or message draft
2
Multi-step form filling
2
Complex Q&A with reasoning
3
Document analysis
3
Financial planning advice
4
Legal compliance review
4
Enterprise workflow orchestration
4

Tier Access

Which users get which inference

Tier determines model class ceiling, not just usage volume.

Free

  • Class 0–1 unlimited
  • Class 2 with daily limits
  • No Class 3–4 access
  • OSS models only
  • Standard response quality

Pro

  • Class 0–2 unlimited
  • Class 3 with generous limits
  • Class 4 with capped usage
  • Proprietary model access
  • Priority queue

Enterprise

  • All classes unlimited
  • Custom model routing rules
  • Dedicated inference capacity
  • Private model deployment
  • SLA-backed response times

Router Logic

Model router scoring dimensions

The router evaluates each request across these dimensions to select the optimal execution class.

Task type

Classification of the incoming request against known task patterns.

Ambiguity

How unclear or multi-interpretable the request is.

Risk

Potential impact of incorrect output — financial, legal, health.

Reasoning depth

Number of logical steps required for accurate completion.

Language quality

Required fluency, tone precision, and multilingual demands.

User tier

Free, Pro, or Enterprise — determines available model classes.

Workflow sensitivity

Whether the task involves irreversible actions or approvals.

Cost budget

Remaining cost budget for the user's current billing period.

India Context

India-specific considerations

Multilingual routing

Language detection influences model selection. Bhashini-compatible OSS models handle most Indic language tasks; proprietary models are escalated only for complex multilingual reasoning.

Frugal inference

India's cost sensitivity demands aggressive optimisation. The router defaults to the cheapest viable path and avoids proprietary models for routine tasks.

Escalation logic

High-risk tasks (financial, health, legal) trigger mandatory escalation regardless of user tier. Safety overrides cost optimisation.

Cost Discipline

Cost-control rules

Operational discipline that keeps inference economically sustainable at scale.

Default to Class 0 (deterministic) whenever possible
Use smallest viable model within allowed class
Escalate only when confidence drops below threshold
Cache frequent responses to avoid repeated inference
Rate-limit expensive classes per user per day
Prefer open-source over proprietary at equivalent quality
Batch similar requests for efficiency
Monitor cost-per-task and flag anomalies
Never escalate beyond user's tier allowance
Track escalation patterns — optimise routing over time

Connected Architecture

How this connects to the Starter Agent Fabric

The inference plan defines which models run. The Starter Agent Fabric defines how agents are structured. Together, they form ind.ai's execution architecture: a shared orchestration layer that routes requests through the cheapest viable inference path, wrapped in identity, memory, and tier-based access control.

Free users get fast, cost-efficient agents powered by deterministic and open-source inference. Pro users unlock proprietary model access for complex tasks. Enterprise users get custom routing, dedicated capacity, and SLA-backed execution.

ind.ai should not be model-branded. It should be router-led, cost-aware, and outcome-driven.

The inference plan ensures that every request gets the right model — not the most expensive one. This is what makes India-scale AI agents economically viable.